last night our wednesday night small group put on a parents-night-out for the couples with young children at cornerstone church. this is 1 year old (i think) esther brantley. we took care of five kids, aged 4 months to 4 years, and had a lot of fun doing it. granted, we had them outnumbered nearly 2 to 1, so i would definitely say that if there was a winner at the end of the evening, it was the babysitters, not the babysat. however, ender doe did threaten to stage a coup towards the end of the evening when he began throwing stuffed animals on top of the flourescent ceiling lights. lucky for us, the majority of his cohorts have a difficult time walking on their own and were therefore unable to join in the rebellion. suffice to say though, young children are probably the best photographic subjects there are. they're almost completely unaware of the presence of the camera and when they are their posing is often more entertaining.
...
nothing else today - gotta get to work.
so do men have biological clocks? nice kid photo, andy.
Posted by: anna at August 5, 2004 12:36 PMYoung kids are great subjects except if they're moving toward your camera and you are manually trying to focus, that's hard. all they want is to grab your camera.
Posted by: Katie at August 5, 2004 02:25 PMNo kidding. That's where a zone focusing or nice point and shoot comes in handy.
Posted by: Nick at August 5, 2004 03:11 PMWhat this world needs is more babies. Or at least good pictures of babies.
Posted by: Paul B at August 6, 2004 01:03 AMworking on that last request. baby should be here very soon, and I'm wondering if I'll damage his vision with all the pics I'll be taking?
Posted by: bobw at August 6, 2004 02:41 PMOmg thats right! Please come see me and my friends! ;)
Posted by: watch moi at March 18, 2005 07:13 AM